- Résumé
- Sommaire
- Extraits
- Descriptif
- À propos de l'auteur
- Lecture
Rédigez des études contre primes !
Choisissez un sujet dans la liste
Rédigez-le et envoyez-le nous
Recevez votre prime dès validation !
Consultez les sujets disponiblesDevenez auteur ! Publiez et vendez vos articles, dossiers et documents !
Publiez vos documents !The European Union will never be fully democratic: discuss
Résumé de l'exposé
On 13th October 2005 was launched the Commission's ?Plan D? for Democracy, Dialogue and Debate, which intends to ?lay the foundations for the profound debate about Europe's future? in order to ?mak[e] the European Union more democratic? . This strategy is a reply to the appeal for ?a broad debate? made during the European council of June 2005, which took place in a context of ?shock', after the French and the Dutch negative referenda. These ?no? have been considered to some extent to stem from the European democratic deficit and the remoteness of the European Union (EU) from its citizens.
This issue has been regularly highlighted since the 1970s. It has been frequently referred to as a ?parliamentary deficit? and many attempts have been made to address this paradoxical situation : direct election of the European Parliament (EP) in 1979, steady increases in the EP's powers, endeavors to set up a dialogue with European citizens, etc. Nevertheless, the democratic deficit appears severely rooted. But is it a sufficient reason to acknowledge that the European Union will never be fully democratic?
In order to answer this question, we will first examine the meaning of ?democracy? and thus the alleged European ?democratic deficit?. We will then come up with a solution for the EU to overcome this deficit.
Our modern societies emphasize respect for the concept of ?democracy?. However, this ideal doesn't refer to a clearly defined idea, as it has been given different meanings throughout History. Etymologically, for instance, it means ?the people's power' and it expressly refers to the direct democracy exercised in the Greek city-states. In our contemporary conception, the power is still thought as stemming from the people but delegated to representatives who take decisions on citizens' behalf ? since it is concretely impossible to apply a system of direct democracy in our vast and populous states. This principle of delegation is attached to few other elements such as conditionality which supposes that ?politicians are under a structural imperative to deliver to the electorate and to communicate their achievements?.
But it also presumes the equality of every citizen and the existence of a formal Parliament. These four elements are necessary to a representative democracy which constitutes the current ?standard of legitimacy?. The fulfilment of these criteria would thus attest the democratic nature of a state.
Sommaire de l'exposé
- Introduction
- The meaning of 'democracy' and thus of the alleged European 'democratic deficit'
- The way the EU could overcome this deficit
- Irish negative vote at the Treaty of Nice
- Shift in the conception of the representative democracy
- Conclusion
Extraits de l'exposé
[...] in: European law Journal, vol.11, No4, July 2005, pp.452-45 Ibid., p Ibid., p. 454-456. Giandomenico Majone, ?Europe's democratic deficit: the question of standards', in: European Law Journal, Vol No1, March 1998, p.5. It is true that the direct elections were not the rule until 1979 and that this parliament had the name of Assembly, being merely consultative. As we have seen it, conditionality presumes that ?politicians are under a structural imperative to deliver to the electorate and to communicate their achievements? (e.g., Crum, op.cit., note p. [...]
[...] The decision-making system is indeed completely different from the one applied at the Member States level. In a nation-state the division of power even if it is slightly transformed due to the ?parliamentary rationalisation'[23] establishes a certain hierarchy between the executive, legislative and judiciary powers and defines their core functions in order to fit with the principles of accountability and transparency. On the contrary, within the EU there is no clear division of power and institutions are in an horizontal political system.[24] No institution can impose its proposal to the others: the whole system relies on a constant interaction between the institutions trying to influence each other in order to reach a consensus leading to a decision.[25] Besides, more than thirty different decision-making procedures have been registered[26] and one have to add to these procedures all the non formal ways of decision-making developed around the Open method of coordination and the concept of ?soft law?. [...]
[...] There is however few differences in the procedure by which they are elected even the election day is not everywhere the same, since some country organise elections on Thursday and others on Sunday. e.g. Magnette, op.cit., note p Loukas Tsoukalis, What kind of Europe ? Oxford University Press p e.g. Dinan, op.cit., note p e.g. Magnette, op.cit., note p Ibid., p However the TECE forecasts that the European Council should take into account the results of the elections at the EP, while proposing a candidate for the appointment of the Commission's president (art. I-26, Treaty establishing a constitution for Europe, available at: http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/lex/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2004:310:SOM:EN:HTML .2005). e.g. [...]
[...] Commission of the European Communities, European Governance, a white paper, op. cit, note 33, p.6. There is a section called to react to the White paper? giving the opportunity to send comments by email or by post. e.g. Commission of the European Communities, European Governance, a white paper, op. cit, note 33, p e.g. Magnette, op.cit., note p Ibid., p. 182-183. [...]
[...] This situation is mainly due to the position of the member states: they understand the benefits of giving up a part of their national competences to the EU but they would like to remain sovereign. Consequently some authors explain there is a need to think about a new model of democracy which could take into account the EU's specific characteristics.[36] Since the Irish negative vote at the Treaty of Nice, a new rhetoric has been developed assuming that ?democracy depends on people being able to take part in public debate?.[37] The negative reply to the referendum has been interpreted as a consequence of a decision taken too far away from the consideration of people. [...]
À propos de l'auteur
Catherine B.Etudiant- Niveau
- Avancé
- Etude suivie
- sciences...
- Ecole, université
- Prepa ENA
Descriptif de l'exposé
- Date de publication
- 2006-08-17
- Date de mise à jour
- 2006-08-17
- Langue
- anglais
- Format
- Word
- Type
- dissertation
- Nombre de pages
- 8 pages
- Niveau
- avancé
- Téléchargé
- 4 fois
- Validé par
- le comité de lecture
Autres docs sur : The European Union will never be fully democratic: discuss
- Are Muslim and Western European values generally incompatible? Discuss with reference to the...
- The European Union and organised crime
- Why did Britain not become a leading member of the European Union and why is it sometimes...
- The Sustainable Development Policy within the European Union
- The new Labour government stance on the Economic and Monetary Union (1997)

- E-commerce
- Écologie et environnement
- Économie générale
- Économie internationale
- Marchés étrangers
- Micro-économie, emploi & chômage
- Patrimoine & immobilier
- Politique économique
- Questions sociales
- Relations internationales
- Sciences politiques
- Théories & notions économiques
- Union européenne
- Vie politique et élections